|
On 14/09/12 13:03, tom wrote:
On 14/09/12 11:56, steve wrote:
On 12/09/12 17:26, Brad Rogers
wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:50:50 +0100
Simon Waters <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Simon,
I've always had good support from Entanet, far better than we got from
Virgin when we were paying big bucks for un-contended bandwidth.
Virgin, and NTL before them, were compete dick-wads. Thank god I got
away from them when I was on dial-up. It was far less stressful changing
over then, what with no MAC required or contract period to worry about.
I have no complaints with Virgin, been with them for almost 9
years (formerly Telewest) and just had by broadband speeds
upgraded per following speedtest.net result
http://www.speedtest.net/result/2178954610.png
60 megs plus does very nicely thanks!
I think during the whole time I have been with them, I have
maybe had 3 minor outages.
Granted, I live in Plymouth which has the requisite cabled
infrastructure in place and am mindful that those in rural areas
do not have such access.
Regards,
Its people like you who will not complain about uncompressed data
that will lead to lonog long download times in the country!!!
Tom te tom te tom
Huh?...people like me?...what's that supposed to mean? Why should I
complain? I pay good money for my broadband, I am sorry that somehow
you think I am contributing to problems elsewhere, where simply an
accident of location affords such service. Would you complain if you
were here and took advantage of what's available?
regards,
|
