[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
There's a lot of talk of reduced life expectancy due to thermal changes. First, I find it difficult to believe that this is not accounted for, to some degree, in the design of the components, and second, I suggest that you'd have to turn your PC on and off so many times that you're more likely to be upgrading components naturally before any failure due to metal fatigue. I could be wrong, of course, but environmental considerations should be paramount and I don't believe that there's any good reason for leaving equipment - including routers - on when not being used. Where's the evidence to the contrary? If anyone's seen any articles, etc. to this effect, please post links. I turn all my gear off when not in use, never had any problems that I'm aware of. Jack.
> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:06:03 +0000 > From: barnaby@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [LUG] Computer on time > > Just wondering, > > I leave my desktop computer switched off most of the time, and turn it > on as and when I want to use it. As I finish each session I turn if off > again. I have noticed that some people leave theirs running all the > time, or almost anyway. > > Is there any good/bad or right/wrong way with this, or is it just up to > the individual? > > thanks, > > Neil > > -- > The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG > http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list > FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq |
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq