[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 13/01/12 16:51, Simon Waters wrote: > My experience is that the strict procedures over spending money in such > organisations is a big incentive to use suitably qualified gratis > solutions. Whilst the requirements on security sensitive stuff to be > tested, or shown to correctly use encryption protocols, prevents wider > deployment of (probably) perfectly good free software solutions because > they often don't have large organisations behind them paying for testing > and certification. The real irony here being that if good encryption software is needed then Open Source is a far better option than proprietary. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8TOO8ACgkQsoRLMhsZpFcs0wCfbsC3eb3z1Ghgd778/ZPs7Vry BeQAnjG5ttaczcCbF70WHs90b0LwY+Rg =3KjX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq