[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On 07/12/10 15:35, James Kilty wrote: > On 07/12/10 14:29, Gordon Henderson wrote: >> On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Gibbs wrote: >> >>> On 07/12/10 13:02, James Kilty wrote: >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> and then its all like this. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> james >>> >>> This happened to me yesterday too. The email rendered in HTML >>> initially but the second time I viewed it it would only view in plain >>> text (and I can't get it back to HTML). >>> >>> I would be interested in this too. >> >> Don't you realise you *need* to use Outlook to view emails? If you're >> not using Outlook, then imagine what you're missing. >> >> Or perhaps not, as it's a marketing mail and the marketers obviously >> don't give a shit about the 10% of the population that doesn't use >> Outlook. >> >> Basically they have probably base64 encided the entire message, thinking >> that's for the best. Wankers. People like that are best off not doing >> business with, but before you vote with your wallet, make absolutely >> 100% sure they you tell them why. > I saw th base 64 and di wonder. It is from The Bumblebee Conservation > Trust based at stirling Uni. I did see the EXCH2007.ad.stir.ac.uk in the > header and thought this must be it. > > I will reply to the sender, but can they change any settings to make it > work for me? > > Thanks > > James > >> >> Gordon >> (Obviously grumpy today!) > Not at all - good to have a rant sometimes. > Now for the good news hotmail aparently now lets you embed up to 200 photos in 1 e-mail aghhhhhh Paul -- Paul Sutton Cert SLPS (Open) http://www.zleap.net 17th September 2011 - Software freedom day -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq