[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On 23/06/2010, stinga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <stinga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 22/06/10 09:00:37, Rob Beard wrote: >> On 21/06/10 21:36, stinga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >>> Not fast enough, 100M would be good, 1000M would be better, we are >>> moving large files around. >>> >> >> I get the feeling it isn't going to be cheap then if 100M isn't going >> to be fast enough. It's a shame you can't stick some fibre through >> the sewers :-) >> >> I had a quick look for Microwave links, I'm not sure what sort of >> pricing they are, I'm guessing probably expensive. >> >> This company might be able to advise though: >> >> http://www.g4.co.uk/laser_and_microwave_links1.php >> >> I suppose the other option would be to look at getting fibre put in, >> but again I'm assuming that wouldn't be cheap even for a short >> distance. > > We thought of the sewer option! > 100m would do at a push but I would be a problem on occasions. > I will have a look at that URL. > String a washing or fishing line between the two buildings (high up), and hang the fibre optic from that? Our new building is only 6 feet from the old one, so we are using a scafold pole and heavy earth clamp at each end as a conduit until after the Move. Dave -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html