[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 14:32 +0000, bas wrote: <snip> > trouble is with what you are saying is that all things replaced arent > possibly any better than the "old" one. cant really understand your logic. I understood the argument to be that you can't be certain that something new is better unless you have a measurement on some objective scale AND have agreed what measurement is better, rather than that nothing new can possibly be better than something old. It's a very different thing - and I'd like to point out that (to return to the point) if you perceive your setup to be "better" after changing something, then it doesn't really matter if it's actually changed as long as you consider the level of improvement to be worth the cost. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html