[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Thursday 21 February 2008 16:25, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:11:39 +0000 > Tony Sumner <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello Tony, > > > themselves. Do they have a reason for restricting access to Windows? > > Yes; Laziness & cost. It saves them having to provide support for > other browsers. Its NOT laziness & cost - its pig ignorance. If they knew what they were doing then it would be browser/os agnostic. However they are probably M$ trained monkeys and no nuthing... Theres a really moronic attitude to web design which seems to be lets use microsoft and then , maybe' go for cross compliance. I've always found that going for cross compliance first (ie standards) leads to a a universal solution a lot faster than the M$ prototype. Now think - if they cant even code to simple standards how are they going to keep my details etc safe? I'd take my custom elsewhere - and I'd avoid the SM like the plague for a long time. Tom te tom te tom -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html