[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Sat, 05 May 2007 12:40:11 +0100 Julian Hall <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I've only recently covered this in university. Software is covered > under the Supply of Goods and Services Act, not the Sale of Goods > Act. Software is not deemed to be a 'good' as it is the result of a > service provided, that of writing the code. IP is assigned to the > software in one of three ways, Exclusive where IP is retained in > entirety by the author, and the purchaser simply pays for a single > license to use it, Non-exclusive where the user pays to be able to > redistribute it, again under license Non-exclusive also covers situations where the copyright holder provides the software under a licence or as public domain software without any purchase or exchange of monies. Naturally, that side of it would not come under the above Acts, instead it comes under the Copyright Act. Public domain requires that the copyright holder renounces their assigned copyright in a public manner, at which point the software is beyond legal constraint. There is no warranty, there is no liability, there is no protection, restriction or limitation. Public domain code is completely free - but that freedom is regularly abused and therefore free software needs to use the protection of the Copyright Act using a free software licence. >, or Assignment where the whole > IP rights to the software are sold. Or given away without cost, e.g. public domain code. > Obviously the latter is the most expensive. Not true - as shown by public domain code. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgphsusO3y7Ch.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html