Re: [LUG] What better way to justify the proprietary bits of Ubuntu than a practically useless stooge distro to point at whenever we're questioned

[Neil Stone <neil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ben Goodger wrote:
> On 4/25/07, *David Johnson* <dj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:dj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     If this is not the case, I don't see why Ubuntu couldn't take the Debian
>     approach with a simple yes/no option to enable proprietary software...
> 
> 
> AFAIK they do. Unfortunately it is "yes" by default.
> 

See my previous comment on GnuSense and it's package management...

- --
Neil Stone

Systems Administrator
FlashTek UK

- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GIT d+(++) s: a-(?) C++++(--) UL++++$ P+ L+++ E- W+++ N+
o+ w--- O M PS+ Y+ PGP++ t+ 5+ X+ R+ tv+ b- DI++ D+++ G
e h--- r+++ y++++(**)
- -----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGL223z3Av8JKgzxQRAroyAKCB1oEQH2RpsBb+t4cs5lYQbuQaxACgnCd3
wU6P3AqKWzfWHaPNlNhPUxA=
=5DZB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html