[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] What better way to justify the proprietary bits of Ubuntu than a practically useless stooge distro to point at whenever we're questioned

To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LUG] What better way to justify the proprietary bits of Ubuntu than a practically useless stooge distro to point at whenever we're questioned
From: "Ben Goodger" <goodgerster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:53:04 +0100

On 4/25/07, David Johnson <dj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If this is not the case, I don't see why Ubuntu couldn't take the Debian
approach with a simple yes/no option to enable proprietary software...

AFAIK they do. Unfortunately it is "yes" by default.

--
Ben Goodger
#391382
---------------------

Mi admiras religiajn; ili estas fine ebliĝinta solvi la maljunegan demandon "kiel oni povas vivi sencerbe?".

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html

Follow-up: Re: [LUG] What better way to justify the proprietary bits of Ubuntu than a practically useless stooge distro to point at whenever we're questioned
- From: Neil Stone

References:

Prev by Date: Re: [LUG] Update to Feisty?
Next by Date: Re: [LUG] What better way to justify the proprietary bits of Ubuntu than a practically useless stooge distro to point at whenever we're questioned
Previous by thread: Re: [LUG] What better way to justify the proprietary bits of Ubuntu than a practically useless stooge distro to point at whenever we're questioned
Next by thread: Re: [LUG] What better way to justify the proprietary bits of Ubuntu than a practically useless stooge distro to point at whenever we're questioned
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread