[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 20:07:10 +0100 Julian Hall wrote: > James Wonnacott wrote: > > >eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:52:CF:64 > > inet addr:10.0.12.10 Bcast:10.0.15.255 Mask:255.255.252.0 > > > >eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:48:52:CF:65 > > inet addr:10.0.12.2 Bcast:10.0.15.255 Mask:255.255.252.0 > > > I may be being a bit thick here, but isn't the broadcast supposed to be > on the same subnet? Both these have IPs on 10.0.12.* but subnet for the > B'cast is 10.0.15.* > > Am I barking up the wrong tree? > > Kind regards, > > Julian > > > PS Sorry Alex, the Winblows version of Thunderbird replies from the > default address while the Linux version replies from the one the mail > was addressed to. Typicaly Linux makes sense whereas Windows doesn't! They are on the same subnet - he is not using a standard class A/B/C subnet mask. Grant. -- Artificial intelligence is no match for nuratal stidutipy. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the message body to unsubscribe. FAQ: www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html