Re: [LUG] Mutt and mailing lists

[mike <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 25/07/04 08:36:02, Kai Hendry wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 10:20:57AM +0300, Kai Hendry wrote:
> > I think DCLUG works nicely with mutt thanks to the Reply-to:  
> header.
>
> Whoa. I take this back. Just learnt about the potential evils of
> Reply-to munging:
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=6693&group_id=1

Yea, someone else who agrees.
I have a formail command in procmail to unmunge the munging...

#+
#Munge the non-rfc headers
#-
:0
* ^Sender:.*owner-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
{
:0hf
| /usr/bin/formail -k -I Reply-To: -i "List-Post:  
<mailto:list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>" -X  ""
:0:
/home/mike/mail/inbox/
}


If you interested...

--
'ooroo

Mike...(:)-)
---------------------------------------------------
Email: mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx        o
You need only two tools.        o /////
A hammer and duct tape. If it    /@   `\  /) ~
doesn't move and it should use  >  (O)  X<  ~  Fish!!
the hammer. If it moves and      `\___/'  \) ~
shouldn't, use the tape.           \\\
---------------------------------------------------

--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the
message body to unsubscribe.