[ Date Index ][
Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Neil Williams wrote: > >> >>BT can be good on modems, but I think you are only garanteed >>9600 baud under the USO. > > > Not even that. According to the BT engineer who came today to check the line > noise, BT landlines have NO obligation to support data at all. My mistake European legislation binding on BT and Kingston telecommunications is to provide 2.4Kbps I knew it was less than 14.4, but more than nothing, as I lobbied for the USO to include G3 fax's which usually use 14.4. Fax is hardly cutting edge technology in 2003. 2.4Kbps is great for people like the Met Office who just need remote data stations to relay in, but they can use Meteor bounce radio connections and other stuff. I don't know if the standards include reliability figures for operation, but at the very least BT may have misrepresented their obligations to you. Anyway the USO is mainly for people in truely remote areas, with crappy phones lines wandering miles over open moorland - something like I imagine Nick's place to be like - I just thought such people ought to able to send faxes these days. OFTEL disagreed AFAIR :-( Simon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE+SZVVGFXfHI9FVgYRAvM7AKCwhl6Mq/DHvwUvyMp+vNyeq3I5xwCeJGLE M4nxVwLMwuQv8A1PMDg7CIQ= =GMgk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the message body to unsubscribe.