[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Should his argument not be with the source of the first result, and a demand that it be prefaced by "this is out of date and he is no longer bankrupt"? On 15 May 2014 14:02, Philip Hudson <phil.hudson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 15 May 2014 12:20, Tom <madtom1999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> What happens when someone in europe uses a VM outside europe to do a search >> that will show up his bankruptcy > > Please try to get this right, everyone. It keeps coming up and it's > critical to understand what we're talking about correctly. He's *not* > trying to censor, suppress, hide or delete his bankruptcy from search > results. He just isn't. > > If that's what you think we're talking about then please go back to > the beginning and start again with a correct understanding. He's > saying -- and I think he's 100% correct -- that it is a) inaccurate > and, thus, against the public interest, and b) unfair to him, to have > as the *first* or *only* result for a search on his name an old > bankruptcy *and* for there to be no way he can get this changed. > > Also, let's all agree that we understand that "public record" (perhaps > not even online) and "first/only item on a Google search results page" > are not morally equivalent terms. > > -- > Phil Hudson http://hudson-it.no-ip.biz > @UWascalWabbit PGP/GnuPG ID: 0x887DCA63 > > -- > The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG > http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list > FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq -- Adrian Midgley http://www.defoam.net/ -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq