[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] EU ruling on Google
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] EU ruling on Google
- From: Philip Hudson <phil.hudson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 14:02:00 +0100
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcglug.org.uk; s=1396810045; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID:Date:From:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version; bh=sMqwKDF/xTXjkEjzsIRmIbYe3DUIdYfu2WeqxSfw678=; b=OyMyzf1jJIMZld/DZFwWnGOdfVWYdkNx2kghJrdEwFm9nWjuzT5FlsU0FYoFPz19QWRXV11ZsEHzVM2MmPmorgbf6YVdl+CdW388X6suwwcp0yhQOZ7uNQRDRRvamJZXJvgXPGPguQNDJJu1zhh2l9CFgD0zLdoTi+9xi4eGt/U=;
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=2h1qwAoZTFa3whHMe2GHi/+ICoYlO7+h3FFdsYCBbsI=; b=g0cNUVZ69Z6Qd+lpEe+hJX8IWRpH0Vq3BnBx1btO1fTC+Vq4Th11Utu0rXKevGG6mr c2Lj20fGL8VhI8Mexs+/mytnhSemMAwbNBmFCGtLn3y+DM3Rhx3uhDZ8RcjePsQVOtqQ D3XjXFldSp19RIPJRfRspP4VizD9ss0pV/xLya4f2z7lgpFm56d5pqg1Kji0HwffJkZw H9Re6riK4NtdNYBwUj6xIIVYdxamECYQSdrzzTV7MZbT+iD+5smQJnFalDXbqK6N3WBX /OXq4XfTiz6hFL9j1DZa6Yr1ZJdOEMASoeV1ZwSSbH0Kt2IKOSHAGyVmCmwi3mmT1pnt Qb0Q==
On 15 May 2014 12:20, Tom <madtom1999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What happens when someone in europe uses a VM outside europe to do a search
> that will show up his bankruptcy
Please try to get this right, everyone. It keeps coming up and it's
critical to understand what we're talking about correctly. He's *not*
trying to censor, suppress, hide or delete his bankruptcy from search
results. He just isn't.
If that's what you think we're talking about then please go back to
the beginning and start again with a correct understanding. He's
saying -- and I think he's 100% correct -- that it is a) inaccurate
and, thus, against the public interest, and b) unfair to him, to have
as the *first* or *only* result for a search on his name an old
bankruptcy *and* for there to be no way he can get this changed.
Also, let's all agree that we understand that "public record" (perhaps
not even online) and "first/only item on a Google search results page"
are not morally equivalent terms.
--
Phil Hudson http://hudson-it.no-ip.biz
@UWascalWabbit PGP/GnuPG ID: 0x887DCA63
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq