[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On 01/04/14 22:37, Simon Avery wrote:
I didn't know that. I was told (by at least one) that they had purchased the database from another company - who I also found on the web. Is it not the supplier's responsibility to make sure the product they are selling is fit for purpose, i.e. is accurate in this case? Why should the purchaser have to make sure the product they bought in good faith is accurate? I take your point that as the company making the call they are liable, but if, as in my case, they immediately accept fault when challenged and end the call, doesn't that demonstrate some degree of acting responsibly? I've had this number for errr... 19 years I think. I didn't know about the TPS back then and to be honest spam callers have only been an issue in the last ten years, so that's 9 years when my number - which has always been ex-directory as well - wasn't protected by the TPS. Surely being ex-directory is enough? Julian |
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq