[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] Vigor 2130n strange behaviour
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] Vigor 2130n strange behaviour
- From: Philip Hudson <phil.hudson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 21:31:55 +0100
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=EDSQhkWSfGvn5rY5IPkU/n9hyxCst+kjmb/BKv2YPJY=; b=R7aKUFhRL15Z7jQiFnSBS7h269pmR0XJ1joQrZdTrqBQ9ErMUF2an5SSsBjf7mnPM8 d5KTQ7Xd74LNaxoaz0F/9EhgYN6f8M+GMyWOTOb0XzAhzo4+LNmFMnWXYrDMCO6b39A9 FFUFK/MfqGmNGhSQUBppfrecRQsGN2R3xJNiD/SvJxFqLEw1qVUFSkZSqyNhWBcNaQ27 XveeRxFnXIKIdDeDPX7/jxSXOcWhEDpCRVdAdCVFATYe4qOFDibILPqGVfI79xFtfm5O ufWZoWNLDfU8oC5Q/SzCpmoxmhRbYAZi6iKXblfkIrZ2RUvh8orFdFSZD608p1TUAAKx 9mSg==
On 30 March 2014 20:28, bad apple <mr.meowski@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well, it sounds like your Vigor supports setting up probably 4 separate
> SSIDs as isolated networks (many consumer models have been able to do
> this for a while now), which it looks like you're already doing.
Don't know if this is what Daniel's model offers, but it is definitely
*not* what Vigor models of the past have meant by "VLAN".
--
Phil Hudson http://hudson-it.no-ip.biz
@UWascalWabbit PGP/GnuPG ID: 0x887DCA63
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
