Do your research on the satellite options. While it undoubtably does work and is a valid option for those with truly zero alternatives, most have quite low caps (already mentioned - and often barely above mobile caps), where Satellite really fails is latency. Minimum 600ms to reach the internet, double that if you're using true satellite (send and receive, rather than "lite" where you send via adsl and receive via satellite - double the points of failure!). Compare that to 50-100ms for typical adsl and you WILL notice the difference, especially when web browsing, ssh etc. Not so much downloads or locally hosted email, perhaps.
Whilst technology has improved a lot with satellite - and the above latencies are for low-earth geostationary orbits rather than the first lot of higher orbits - they haven't yet managed to break the speed of light barrier so your data does have to bounce up and down quite a long way.
For me, choices would be cable, then fttc, then "normal" adsl, then 2x adsl then 3g, then satellite.
