[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On 21/01/14 09:55, Philip Hudson wrote: > > On 20 January 2014 23:40, Simon Waters <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > reasons that > are never explained. > > Source vs binary distribution. FTFY But when I get Redhat or Centos they are both binaries, and both supply me the source. I don't think this is the differentiator. They start discussing reproducibility of build environments, which I agree is important, but it is rapidly disappearing into the "who do you trust most?" question rather than matters of a technical nature. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq