[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Probably use apple Julian Hall <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On 14/01/14 20:05, Philip Hudson wrote: >> >> On 14 January 2014 17:58, bad apple <mr.meowski@xxxxxxxx >> >> Where you're so, so very wrong is praising Apple for, of all >> things, the >> pile of sh*t that passes for network functionality in th >> >> Dynamic, transparent, peer-to-peer, DNS- and DHCP-serverless, >> NAT-less, automatically self-configuring and self-federating >> networking. Everyone who doesn't make their living from selling or >> supporting networking technologies needs it. Will we get it? >> >> >> >All of which brings me to the pet peeve of a friend of mine, and me to >a >lesser extent. If we have trouble getting protocols we designed as >humans to talk to one another, why is it in every blasted >science-fiction movie where there is an alien computer they network it >to a laptop and the bloody thing works flawlessly?[1] Who the hell is >their sysadmin?? :) -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq