[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] distribution with good 386 support

To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LUG] distribution with good 386 support
From: Simon Avery <digdilem@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 19:54:06 +0000
Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=N8d9oPlwI8ho6n+h7Oyi/U5/20qHPiKvSoo/duw7Dok=; b=PAtqt7Fw8Tdyt4Ms/1+ifS7d/DvrxFhxFPKz9bQpE3BYfeqJbG49l+1SX58ghg9fbn zvecQprA7WBpW6E/Xlhq39Wr/FhYG9rgF4DMRWGvbxY0nR8wq+GDD2rBV0Gw4erssXwk gWxyiZjujTaqt6LHM/S+stMxWa3dPUKHRHLSR+7edDCQ5ZqTR40CEpYpdPfbYpVdiT8r WvcDsiFihq5fVb26bROTwoUC0AldPDtAWu7mQ4KCNbRN5lweo2J87i9nnm3Z5pS1/02H ex5szVYeuJvKyx2hKV6ZzyeutuU4kYwgk48/217baQIfgNHmdIeE//EP8CxiFJHh3I35 vMVw==

On 8 January 2014 13:19, Tom <madtom1999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Are there any distributions out there that keep up with developments without dropping 386 support?
Even if I have to build my own kernels I've a few old machines I'd rather not bin.

Do we need to stage a LUG intervention?

Let them go, Tom. I'm sure they've served you well, so let them rest...

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq

Follow-up: Re: [LUG] distribution with good 386 support
- From: Tom
Follow-up: Re: [LUG] distribution with good 386 support
- From: Rob Beard

References:
- [LUG] distribution with good 386 support
  - From: Tom

Prev by Date: Re: [LUG] Etiquette was Re: Lightening this morning ...
Next by Date: Re: [LUG] CentOS joining the RedHat mothership
Previous by thread: Re: [LUG] distribution with good 386 support
Next by thread: Re: [LUG] distribution with good 386 support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread