[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread ]
Re: [LUG] OT: Privacy is not dead
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] OT: Privacy is not dead
- From: Philip Hudson <phil.hudson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 18:08:57 +0100
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references; bh=vAdOO9JorMQMKYn7jDALWaopKJpIFVpo3w+6Dg+agH0=; b=TUMBfpt6Go5EClIP94uCRj9ZgGVY+CdBeXukr+Mw3ytNHQCS2sCb7tpJhAw3eMAfmU PtGeZOkuifE+mTfmQVMQ27HCjmKlXjznULIAlh8V778uTvdX87F8waVTw3G/zCVyHdAA GxIdpudTEnLM71F3SatUELEKIgSyxTU8vPjJOy8Td8Bbj16BYisNa9yt/Eeo32Z2OiiC XfNMsBcbwCitqOIXdwDFkOokzhAIPMwOkjkEqmUlykKjOx7o9gHACPlasWJUf5E8JfZN bZ7P7K2D177jxYUf3+3MLypyEcGVKD0rOINeYy8mXbQHhr9WKBVsF24dAXi7IKOgBjAY Kmow==
On 31 Aug, 2013, at 5:05 pm, bad apple wrote:
The only reason SSL works at all as intended
Is this not an equally deluded claim? I thought the broken-ness of CA
SSL was pretty much an established fact.
--
Phil Hudson http://hudson-it.no-ip.biz
@UWascalWabbit PGP/GnuPG ID: 0x887DCA63
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
