[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] sky force MS to rename skydrive

To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LUG] sky force MS to rename skydrive
From: Martijn Grooten <dcglug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 09:23:01 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lapsedordinary.net; s=mail; t=1375435381; bh=0P9HKLwQvM9WLqZ9Br208fGVvtDp9qGDQV4T6KGNPIU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dFjsm/MY27iWPzlLQMHou3EWV/5E+t8+DxQSuOJ3+enRH4H1GKbKLgOkYW/3da1aP sRI8A3bVSFLcUUc0d4GK6GN2D1K7wMSH4eM3IpdGLRSfS9PAupIQ8/TmVDznrnjPRY nbj640sFohK+IvjK/LQH35dhcHNm5C6xxC3VMojs=

On Fri, 2 Aug 2013, Ian Dickinson wrote:

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:07 AM, tom wrote:

Its a good job you cant trademark numbers cos soon that's all that will be
available to us.

Meanwhile, back on the Bad News Ranch:

http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=46044

I don't think you can trademark a number in that you can forbid othersfrom using it. But using 386 in a computer-related context is probablygoing to get you into trouble with Intel.


Martijn.


--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq

References:
- [LUG] sky force MS to rename skydrive
  - From: Paul Sutton
- Re: [LUG] sky force MS to rename skydrive
  - From: Dan Dart
- Re: [LUG] sky force MS to rename skydrive
  - From: lug
- Re: [LUG] sky force MS to rename skydrive
  - From: tom
- Re: [LUG] sky force MS to rename skydrive
  - From: Ian Dickinson

Prev by Date: Re: [LUG] sky force MS to rename skydrive
Next by Date: [LUG] Using Google's two-factor authentication on Linux
Previous by thread: Re: [LUG] sky force MS to rename skydrive
Next by thread: Re: [LUG] sky force MS to rename skydrive
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread