[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:30:16AM +0100, bad apple wrote: > On the other hand that data is safe from everything except an act of god > I think - it's utterly uncrackable, untraceable and totally deniable as > it can't be linked to me in any way.* > > I love the historical reference to Cromwell, but he didn't have access > to the internet, massive paranoia and solid sysadmin skills: luckily, I do. > > Regards > > > * no smart comments about this email giving the game away please - I'll > simply deny this in court too! "Will the defendant, Mr Meowski, please > take the stand..." does have a nice ring to it though :] > http://xkcd.com/538/ Any state in the world can make it extremely uncomfortable for non disclosure. If nothing else have a look at the fun and games with "Kim Dotcom" in New Zealand As another example: Julian Assange who looks like he has successfully imprisoned himself in the Ecuador Embassy for a number of years -- Henry Communication not signed with an original manual signature or an appropriately verified digital signature is not binding. Thu Apr 25 07:14:54 BST 2013 -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq