[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On 21/04/13 16:51, Simon Waters wrote: > There is no need to assume inspectors of source code need be human. > > On the other hand if you've had one of those emails from David Wheeler you'll know > it isn't quantity of inspectors that matter. > But these automated tools still need to be programmatically created, checked and debugged by the very same human programmers from our pool of ~7 billion... My (pedantic) point is only that it is impossible for the number of source code checkers to have no upper limit. Cardinality and set theory tell us that, as well as common sense! Who's David Wheeler? Or I guess, which one? I googled but there are many candidates with no particular one being the obvious one. Regards -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq