[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] Well, that's a bit disappointing....
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] Well, that's a bit disappointing....
- From: Simon Avery <digdilem@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 16:59:02 +0000
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=U4S5xq9LjULmRuStPs3qGp1Xc1Gj3KwFO0r1YzSQ3YY=; b=NgX5tTBFiYpdoPTrrbWlsMtFmf7TT5pL3V9tK0U/srVFJLoHVNdbSdwsGYKUMPqFap 4foPTzVN+nPcfSshQHwsnsBl251Z8SXvQWHTXFIelkETjr/TJ74XO5qf1iXgNLZe2WpX 4KiJR0J/ZNoCr3IJCBHu4g2y44Qfefq0xfEocErb1N98hgeNWynzjqU9bHnPQo9u4viR 0XeSLsdbNEBZ3bjdTl/YhUlWG83Te02aSXI/HUYtEvlmQo1ZNv5ImR1utX6wEtLJnHY5 EqzuHzX5mOtoQZVyqA+UIPeYSFY70NvdWYJQToYgpQ0xhEDTSVF6lN3uPGxTecIw+Swr ExzQ==
On 5 December 2012 10:21, paul sutton <zleap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> a) act as proof of ID
> b) that you have consented to checks being carried out
> Its not the clubs fault, its the people further up.
This is very common.
I once recently encountered a firm where this was the practice. Once
it was signed and waved in front of the MD, the accounts people then
scanned it back in for archive, shredding the dead tree version.
Quite a few people are now scanning and PDFing paper docs, it's
something I've been looking at for work too.
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq
