[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:17:32AM +0100, Simon Waters wrote: > On 12/10/11 22:58, paul sutton wrote: > > > > I tried to install a driver for a brother printer and now get told that > > packages are in an inconsistent state > > Was this from Brother rather than an official repository by any chance? > > > Package: mfcj615wlpr > > Status: install reinstreq half-installed > > Maintainer: Brother Industries, Ltd. > > > I just wondered how i fix this, I can't un-install as it needs to be > > reinstalled to do that, however I can't reinstall due to the state its > > in (buggy package partly) > > > > Any ideas on fixing this so i can start over with trying to install > > drivers for a brother mfcj615w properly and hopefully get it working. > > Probably you do want to install it, even if you have to use "-force-all". > > What is the output of trying to install the deb? > > I had some fun before (a long time ago) which might inspire you. > > http://www.debian-administration.org/users/simonw/weblog/372 > > I vaguely recall the Brother drivers worked by setting up some sort of > old fashioned print driver, and then calling that from the CUPS driver, > so you basically have to mock-up enough of lpr to make the install > happy. Possibly there is some lpr package around that does all this > which ought to be a dependency of the Brother lpr packages but no one on > d-a.org answered my query on this. I can probably dig out details at > work but I think that we now just use stock Debian packages for that > printer. > I use a Brother printer-scanner and yes the installation had to be in phases and I seem to recall reading somewhere that the installation had to be in order - Install the LPR driver for your linux version - Install the CUPS driver - Install the scanner driver All as root from the deb packages. I did not have to "-force-all" http://welcome.solutions.brother.com/bsc/public_s/id/linux/en/index.html Have a look at the "pre-required" procedures Subject to what the others say, I would suggest you go through the procedure again installing the packages in order. -- Henry Photocopies or faxes of my signature are not binding. This email has been signed with an electronic signature in accordance with subsection 7(3) of the Electronic Communications Act 2000. Digital Key Signature: GPG RSA 0xFB447AA1 or 0x3184D537 Smime Fingerprint 98:24:AE:F7:D1:D6:E5:A0:F0:55:2F:40:42:5F:46:24:F9:52:f4:30 Thu Oct 13 08:03:25 BST 2011
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq