D&C GLug - Home Page

[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

Re: [LUG] External hard drives

 

On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:15:10 +0000
tom wrote:

> On 20/12/10 12:22, Gordon Henderson wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Dec 2010, tom wrote:
> >
> >> On 20/12/10 11:50, Gordon Henderson wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 20 Dec 2010, Grant Sewell wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> So how is it that I can create a FAT32 filesystem without hassle
> >>>> under most Linux systems?  In order to play MP3s or watch DVDs I
> >>>> have to jump
> >>>> through hoops, but I seem to be able to create Microsoft-owned
> >>>> filesystems without having to jump through any hoops or pay
> >>>> anybody any
> >>>> money.
> >>>
> >>> AIUI - FATxxx is so "open" and widely adopted that it's patents 
> >>> aren't that enforcable, but what MS does keep a tight grip on is
> >>> the extended filename mechanism that's an extension to FAT.. So
> >>> if you're happy with uppercase 8+3 filenames, then feel free, but
> >>> if you want nice mixed case long filenames then pay MS...
> >>>
> >>> Of-course IANAL ...
> >>>
> >> Google for Tom Tom Fat and save on heating with the boiling blood
> >> of righteous indignation this winter.
> >
> > I remember it well - and my understanding is that it was the 
> > long-filename extensions that they were penalised for..
> >
> > But maybe I need to read it again.
> >
> > Gordon
> >
> And do you know of anyone that would be happy with 8+3 on a USB - the 
> irony being that Tom Tom could probably have modified their
> requirements so the Tom Tom would work with 8+3 and avoided any
> requirement to pay MS. But they obviously worked out it was cheaper
> to pay MS than expect their programmers to be able to remember/cope
> with it/somehow backdate all those ones already sold with fat32 on
> out there. Could you cope with using a FAT disk to write to?
> Tom te tom te tom

Is it possible to get mkfs.vfat to create a FAT32 filesystem but
without the long filename support?  I couldn't find the relevant
options in the man page.  Or is "long filename support" an inherent
attribute of FAT32 (whereas it wasn't for earlier FATs)?

Grant.

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq