[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On 23/10/10 10:12, John wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 09:41 +0100, Tom Brough wrote: > >> You are absolutely right. HSE recommend an inspection each year by "a >> competent person" which means someone who has the sense to say if the >> PSU brick is cracked or the cable is frayed then it should be replaced. >> For the most part visual inspection is enough. >> >> Even if I could get PAT tests carried out for Â1 (where did she get that >> figure from?) if I have 15 members turning up that's Â15 extra each >> year. Stupid .. Stupid ... Stupid... >> > > Yep, its completely bonkers how far H&S has been taken; I have my own It's worst than that. Whilst a great fuss is being made over minor even imagined risks actual hazards go unaddressed. It even gets to the point where hazards are created in the name of "'elf and safety". e.g. at work we have a problem with "caution wet floor" signs left where likely to trip people up without a wet floor anywhere near them. > solution I would love to implement if made President of the UK.. I would > remove the warning labels and guards off everything and let the problem > sort it self out.. Darwinism at its finest :]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq