[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:15:05 +0100 Dave Foxcroft wrote: > On 16/07/2010 10:56, Gordon Henderson wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Dave Foxcroft wrote: > > > >> On 16/07/2010 09:06, Gordon Henderson wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> They tell me 3CX needs an IIS server to work under too (for more > >>> than a trivial installation) - and when you put the licensing > >>> costs of that together with everything else, it costs more than > >>> one of my dedicated PBXs... But that's bizarely acceptable for > >>> some people... > >>> > >> IIS Server - Doesn't that come as part of the standard MS Server > >> OS? > >> - just a case of selecting/installing it - much like Apache is > >> available to install in Linux distros. > >> > >> I may well be wrong but I don't think there is any need for any > >> extra licence to run IIS. > > > > I really don't know - nor do I care. > Fair enough..... :-) > > I just know that the person I was talking to (who installs Windows > > servers for a living) said it needed some additional licenses for a > > bigger system than the demo he was doing. > > > > Gordon > > > I guess the guy knows what is needed and knows his way through the MS > licencing minefield. > > Dave That is not always the case. There are plenty of people around who merely buy more licenses [for xyz software] because they believe it to be necessary without necessarily actually checking. Grant. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/listfaq