[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] XEN virtualization expertise?
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] XEN virtualization expertise?
- From: Dan Dart <dandart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:40:07 +0100
- Delivered-to: dclug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jCp7iBsiJkx4cGdIHnZhK/b2oHBfTPGk1dl5yEjfw1M=; b=HCGAprKh/30EUFlVh6lYTF6Koq2UEXDYfP3ynuHX1bhTIb5KCvR+sOWCWcqRMlCPlD B0g6UKAg7/nILzOTLS4p0uZ3zwmdIG1zQkenHzBB4booF2ZNrET/aUpBHZ+B5yXVge5v NMUgUfAPht+et/pFAc4YRh7Acsg/ynugdmG+M=
> XEN (and KVM) should work OK on CPUs without virtualisation, but there will
> be more of a speed penalty.
Well, you'll have to use paravirtualisation to get full speed.
KVM won't run in KVM mode, just QEMU mode.
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html
