[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On 03/06/10 12:47, Rhia Knowles wrote:
Also I think you can off-set some of the costs against the saving in hardware - with every new Windows release there is a leap in the hardware required to run it. Linux in comparison uses lower specAlso Microsoft likes to change things about Windows and Office. In ways which affect both end users and administrators.Seconded. Most people I know hate office 2007 when they have to work on it. Open Office scores by having the usual word processor interface instead of a stupid ribbon which is totally non-intuative and forces everyone to be either retrained or stumble around the tabs blindly looking for the save or print dialog which is hidden on the office logo button (which doesnt even look like a button)
Funnily enough I was having this conversation with someone yesterday. They said that they were reasonably experienced Excel users and could get on fine with Excel up to 2003 but when given Excel 2007 to use, it took them 45 minutes to work out how to save a file. They said they'd seen someone else use OpenOffice and commented on how it looked similar.
I know Office 2010 has a similar interface to Office 2007, but what about all those users who are used to 2003 and older versions?
I can't help but think it was all a ploy for Microsoft partners to sell more training (the user I spoke to commented about how they'd need re-training on Office 2007).
Rob -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html