[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Rob Beard wrote:
On 29/04/10 10:42, Neil Stone wrote:On 04/29/10 10:23, Rob Beard wrote:Hi folks, Just seen this on The Register... http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/29/microsoft_htc_linux_patents/ I wonder what Google think about this? RobHow the hell can they threaten legal action without being specific about what laws/patents have been broken ?That's what I was wondering, but they managed the same with TomTom. Rob
TomTom was about the FAT/longfilename patent -As for not being specific SCO is still dragging out is court case after 7 years and many hundreds of millions of dollars. Now who needs to be specific - the mafia dont tell you which leg they'll break but the threat still works.
Tom te tom te tom -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html