[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On 29/04/2010 11:52, Grant Sewell wrote:
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:08:54 +0100 Julian Hall wrote:On 29/04/2010 10:42, Neil Stone wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/29/10 10:23, Rob Beard wrote:Hi folks, Just seen this on The Register... http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/29/microsoft_htc_linux_patents/ I wonder what Google think about this? RobHow the hell can they threaten legal action without being specific about what laws/patents have been broken ?Isn't that like arresting someone for murder but saying they won't name the victim? 'It will be less expensive for you to cop a plea now than go to court to find out who you're supposed to have killed.' Sounds daft put that way. That would be because it IS daft. JulianHaha! I like that. Mind if I use it at some point? Grant.
Be my guest :) Julian -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html