[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
> Henry Bremridge wrote: > > http://pleaserobme.com/ It is overblown. Unlike the criminals who email me every day enmass, breaking and entering requires physical presence. At which point there are probably easier ways to establish if a house is occupied than tracking down the owner on the Internet. A quick glance out of the window, and I can tell you at least 4 of the properties in my close are currently unoccupied, and that didn't require a GPS enabled phone or the deductive powers of Sherlock Holmes. If I was thinking about it everyday I could get better at this deduction. Of course if you wander into our village and you aren't local, they'll probably start muttering "incomer" and start sharpening knives just in case. Now I'm sure there are new risks with this technology, but there are also new benefits. Listened to a podcast recently where they discussed how meeting people via GPS enabled cell phones applications could be risky (I'll let you figure out what sort of meetings) and I'm sure it carries some risks probably many of them old and well understood by doctors. At no point did it occur to them that the same technology that lets you meet up, also reduced many of the classic risks with such situations, as it lets the police know exactly where you've been and who (or at least whose mobile phone) you've been near. And I dare say other aspects of such interactions are all logged - phone calls, text messages etc. Okay not much good of you are victim number 1 of a serial killer, but I expect it'll stop a lot of serial killers (and other crooks) at victim number 1. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html