[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:33:55 +0000 Paul Sutton wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 07:16:53PM +0000, Rob Beard wrote: > >>> Vi(Vim) vs Emacs :) > >> Oh yeah, that's worse than a holy war isn't it? > >> > >> Personally I'm in the Vi camp :-) > > > > I don't understand why there's so much debate about this. Vi is > > quite obviously better; why would anybody bother using Emacs? > > > > > yikes what have I started, I use joe :) much nicer, I think Neil > (flash) uses nano, > > the one advantage I see with vi is once loaded it tells you how to > exit, which is more than what Emacs does. I will stick to joe, and > LyX. > > Paul I'm a nano fan too, followed by joe and then vi(m). Grant. -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html