[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] OT - Small Wireless Access Points?
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] OT - Small Wireless Access Points?
- From: Dan Lewis <danlewis.ltd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 21:14:41 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6I1imbkJZpqSFUgC3rg6LEDjr5zDUCDITtpOcmoCgbQ=; b=Kqiu83v95iiUys0OJFIxhQ0UgGzLSoGLyq7Ooi7tjTqbn/pxHtZQjVEY8yFiSCNc6W pBZ2x7RSLn37PluIk0WjL8LRcS7HZQH5a1haHJIEVbiSM7r+en9XQXK7N3WOgcdwlOlj logYB81RgPIeaO5HevO9iOGnRUcw8v6HrfuLc=
Yes as i was writing that i was wandering what compression was available - x264 i will have a look at it now :) thx
as for something powerful enough to do it ... come cloud computing pick up breaches and pick up the slack ;) - oh but the compression would have to be done on site ummm ... is that kind of compression something a gpu would be better at rather then a cpu? i have a vague memory that gpus handled massive quantities of simple calculations faster then cpus and cpus the opposite (that is a very old memory so dont know if i am speaking truth here).
Dan
2009/10/7 Rob Beard
<rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dan Lewis wrote:
i just reread my email and yes i know that 150mbit per second is still not fast enough for transmitting hd content let alone two images for 3d interfacing - what i was meaning was a resolution a damn sight better then my little 0.3mb web camera i have now :)
dan
Oh I dunno, with x264 compression. Finding something that'll do that on the fly though on two streams, and fast enough... well that would be your next job.
Rob
--
--
Ogden Nash - "The trouble with a kitten is that when it grows up, it's always a cat."
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html