[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 11:59 +0100, Simon Waters wrote: > Adrian Midgley wrote: > > 2009/9/28 Paul Hirst <paul.hirst@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:paul.hirst@xxxxxxxxxx>> > > > > On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 21:14 +0100, james kilty wrote: > > > > This implication is that if you go and find some old hardware, bring it > > into school (get it electrically tested :-) ) and then stick Linux on > > it, Microsoft deserves to get some money. Huh?? > > The spec seems to say the computers have to have a hard drive, so diskless clients wouldn't be included. Also it seems to specify a high-end graphics card, so put a basic graphics card in the server and that is excluded as well. I am toying with the idea of setting up a campaign called "protecting the unborn child from micro$oft". The plan being to remove their products from primary schools in 5 years, secondary schools in 11, and the workplace in 16. Mark -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html