[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]

[LUG] "Open" software and "open" systems, from an Exeter MSP

To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [LUG] "Open" software and "open" systems, from an Exeter MSP
From: Adrian Midgley <amidgley@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:08:42 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=wPRJMaJAPQkaQhDXPQ+wwwxCe6ykaGeLaedcwobfpTw=; b=tU1HkXE89TWjCDS6kCQu0hv2Rcg8+u0CNr1rgoLYW9KYZ9YfGC3M99o7UQrD9g2d3H S3Abj3xk7IwsCGI2shZxROTFPX1d9CuUtzBiFLQmDudgpk3YIQFnU/Ejb7xoKGRLD2jk 6AS1kQ/swMxQtg1jTMvvl++b386fLmKM2ozzY=

http://www.nexusopensoftware.co.uk/profile/background.ashx

SO the idea that open = good has sunk in.

I didn't see any reason on the website why they describe their systems or software as open that applies to them rather than anyone else.

Anyone know them?

--
Adrian Midgley http://www.defoam.net/

-- 
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html