[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] Anti Virus?
- To: list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [LUG] Anti Virus?
- From: Steven Côté <steven.cote@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:45:42 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TJggL2xK9vjYEjtLbswVVxS5woT4VzG4i5q4JTh37aU=; b=mxwamGxpEf3Tqu9ZgeMrjb5GZh2Q3nFfupL59+LcxFV8U/s+TpDA5+aaSQZbmbMvgd PLY/bus8c7OT4nSa7KiZzykdp1maAocteNdO8NPdv4/GQ2dyOQt/k+ulv60oFNGZ9InU kCRotnGNCNj5FpOuUqX0estOjMY1F8QARI9So=
The appropriate way to address corruption of system files is some sort of file fingerprinting.
I suppose it's also worth mentioning SELinux as well. I still haven't really wrapped my head around it despite it being around for several years now, but my basic understanding is that it dramatically reduces/control the permissions of various process to read and write data based on Role-Based Access Control.
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html
