[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
2008/9/15 Simon Waters <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Jonathan Roberts wrote: >> >> discussed by the OSI too. Good to see both organisations at least >> thinking about the issue pro-actively, and not waiting until they >> themselves become target to these requirements (kind of a moot point >> for OSI, I guess). > > I don't think there is much thinking needed. > > Debian are maintaining a fork of the software with restrictions removed, > it would seem sensible to co-operate on that. Seems like it would be a sensible approach to me. But then common sense seems to be in slim supply lately. > > Longer term I doubt Firefox or minor forks of it, will be the browser of > choice. Webkit has better standards compliance, and v8 is a faster js. > So I assume Chrome will be good. Epiphany already is faster (less XUL), > and has a nicer user interface. Chrome isn't something I would choose to use (I think I naturally turn away from huge corporations, but Google's online services are increasingly making me worry about a huge number of different issues), other Webkit browsers are showing a lot of potential though, like Arora :) -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html