[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Simon Waters wrote: > Has everyone ensured their recursive name servers are making good use of > the ephemeral port range already? And that they're not behind a NAT device that means even patched nameserers are vulnerable? http://blogs.iss.net/archive/dnsnat.html -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html