[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Monday 24 March 2008 17:57, martin.gautier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: .... Cheers - the links I clicked on for licences were dead > The development version is licensed under the Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5, Thats a nice license even if the attributions may end up longer than the offering! > The release version is licensed under Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5 Thats not in the sense you cant change anything so if you find errors/ICDL change tack..... > But hey, half the work is done if anyone wanted to take on the > project. Just check the modules match the current ICDL spec and hack > away... > You might find there's a newer version around anyway. I pulled this URL > from my browser bookmarks as I was involved some time ago. It was quite a > busy project and I know there was a lot of interest from training > organisations at the time... I have close ties with a couple of training organisations and the interest in this sort of thing is generally: Oh goody we can get free course material! Followed by: Oh *** so can the student so we cant charge them! Followed by mutters and rumblings about how these things should be illegal!! Not many organisations will help to anihilate their revenue source! We just have to hope ICDL etc dont get encouraged to think the same way.... Tom te tom te tom -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html