[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Sat, 2007-09-01 at 19:06 +0100, Adrian Midgley wrote: > Julian Hall wrote: > > I think Tom is referring to the specific construction methodology for > > the WTC which IIRC had a single solid spine up the middle. > That was not how they were built. Hi Adrian, where did you get that information from? >>From Wikipedia: "The core of each tower was a rectangular area 87 by 135 feet (27 by 41 m) and contained 47 steel columns running from the bedrock to the top of the tower." The official "pancake collapse" of the floors cannot explain why this core did not remain. Nor the pools of molten metal observed by rescue workers. Nor the utter pulverisation of the buildings, and subsequent pyroclastic flow of dust clouds. Nor the massive explosion in the basement witnessed shortly *before* the plane hit. Nor... Please look into this. If we don't recognise and raise awareness of false flag attacks, we're inviting more of the same! -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html