[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 17:45:54 +0100 james kilty <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 14:55 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > OpenOffice.org 2.0.4a, > Thanks Neil. Please would you explain why it does not have OOo 2.1? 2.1 is not in Debian at all, unstable has 2.0.4.dfsg.2-7 and experimental has 2.2.0-1. Stable and testing have 2.0.4.dfsg.2-5etch1. Personally, 2.0.4 is fine. When 2.1 makes it into unstable, I'll look at the issue then. Debian stable is NOT about the latest and greatest, it is about STABLE packages. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgpvsqiDmFpiK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html