[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Michael Mortimore wrote: >> A cool 4G of swap at 0.1ms access time! > A ramdisk is faster But given that linux caches memory, isn't it better simply to leave any extra ram available for linux to manage than to assign it as a swap, which after all, is for when the memory cannot manage? -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html