[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
On 25/10/06 00:15:17, Simon Waters wrote: > Simon Avery wrote: > > > > Going to give things a while longer as they are, but it's good to > know > > there's another string to the bow if things don't work out. > > I regard greylisting as almost essential these days, even if only > done > selectively. > > Experience here is that the SBL-XBL is amazingly trustworthy, so good > I > currently use it as a Yes/No block before greylisting, or anything > else. > > One should aim to reject spam before the SMTP transaction completes, > so > the false positives get returned to sender (rather than lost in a > "possible spam" folder). So long as return them to the real sender and not my spoofed address! :-) I have noticed that a lot more spam is getting thru and I am not sure why. mailscanner is still scanning it is just not detecting it. I have tried to set up razor but it does not seem to be working at the moment and I am not sure why. Not sure this would help though... -- 'ooroo stinga...(:)-) --------------------------------------------------- Email: stinga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx o You need only two tools. o ///// A hammer and duct tape. If it /@ `\ /) ~ doesn't move and it should, > (O) X< ~ Fish!! use the hammer. If it moves and `\___/' \) ~ shouldn't, use the tape. \\\ --------------------------------------------------- -- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html