[ Date Index ]
[ Thread Index ]
[ <= Previous by date /
thread ]
[ Next by date /
thread => ]
Re: [LUG] MSO, OOo and the executable metaphor
James Fidell wrote:
> You might argue that
> Windows 3.0 was where it all started for most people and that definitely
> didn't launch until the 90s.
May 1990 -- saw it at Exeter University just before I graduated.
> Lots of people in IT today were barely out of nappies then :)
Please you are making me feel old.
--
The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG
http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list
FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html
- References:
- [LUG] MSO, OOo and the executable metaphor
- Re: [LUG] MSO, OOo and the executable metaphor
- Re: [LUG] MSO, OOo and the executable metaphor
- Re: [LUG] MSO, OOo and the executable metaphor
- Re: [LUG] MSO, OOo and the executable metaphor
- Re: [LUG] MSO, OOo and the executable metaphor
- Re: [LUG] MSO, OOo and the executable metaphor
- Re: [LUG] MSO, OOo and the executable metaphor
- Re: [LUG] MSO, OOo and the executable metaphor
- Re: [LUG] MSO, OOo and the executable metaphor
- Re: [LUG] MSO, OOo and the executable metaphor
- Re: [LUG] MSO, OOo and the executable metaphor
- Re: [LUG] MSO, OOo and the executable metaphor