[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Ben Goodger wrote:
> On 05/07/06, *Rob Beard* <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Ben Goodger wrote:
> > On 05/07/06, *Julian Hall* <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > <mailto: lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/5150508.stm
> >
> > Ummmm Macs aren't the only option are they? :)
> >
> >
> > <bbc> What you're forgetting is that Linux is not used by anyone
> > except uber-geeks, and for that reason it's fine to ignore it
> utterly,
> > even down to using Realplayer for streaming media.</bbc>
> >
> > No, they're not, but for the average UK tv-license-payer, you
> mustn't
> > forget that Windows is a part of the computer, as is AOL. A Mac
> is the
> > only even vaguely applicable alternative for them ("what's this
> > colonel thing?!")
> > But meh: Mac == BSD == UNIX =~ Linux, so what's the big deal? The
> > point is to leave Windows - for all Sophos cares, we could probably
> > put people on ERNIE-2 dumb terminals...
>
> ("what's this colonel thing?!") = The guy who knows what the secret
> herbs & spices are for a certain brand of fried chicken :-)
>
> Mac == BSD == UNIX =~ Linux - Well not far off. I think the big
> differences would be the licence and freedoms. I don't see Apple
> giving
> away the source code for all their nice GUI features, or allowing
> anyone
> to port/run MacOS X on any hardware.
>
>
> You can run Mac OS X on any hardware, there's a procedure for doing it
> somewhere...
> The freedoms are largely immaterial from a security standpoint,
> particularly since all of the essential bits of those OSes (I was
> using UNIX to refer to a type of OS , e.g. "windows, mac os 9, unix")
> are open-source/free.
Well you say ANY hardware but I wasn't aware you could run OS X on a Sun
UltraSparc box which you can with Linux. ;-)
Of course the underlying parts (Darwin) are open source (under a BSD
licence?) but the nice gui isn't though is it. Not to mention Apple
aren't too happy with people running MacOS X on non-Apple branded
x86-compatible hardware even though it is possible.
-- The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG http://mailman.dclug.org.uk/listinfo/list FAQ: http://www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html