[ Date Index ] [ Thread Index ] [ <= Previous by date / thread ] [ Next by date / thread => ]
Is what they have in mind something along the lines of the smaller distros, that pacakge mysql into a dedicated server package, Obviously thats difference due to the licensing of MySQL, if this is done right then the outcome should be good, But it must be dome right from the start.
Paul Neil Williams wrote:
On Monday 17 April 2006 3:09 pm, Keith Abraham wrote:What do you think of this.. http://news.ft.com/cms/s/7354696c-cd86-11da-afcd-0000779e2340.htmlDepends if they intend to put Oracle under the GPL. Somehow I doubt it. Makes me glad Debian can't be sold to anyone. (It's volunteers only.) :-) Mandrake -> Mandriva, Caldera -> oblivion, SuSE -> Novell -> Oracle ?GNU/Linux needs strong commercial partners like IBM, RedHat / Ubuntu and strong community partners like Debian / Fedora. Maybe Oracle will join that, maybe not. In some ways, I'd prefer that Oracle do something similar to Canonical.My worry is for SuSE users who may fear their distro becoming a database server release and lagging behind with non-Oracle stuff like KDE or Gnome.
-- http://www.zleap.net http://www.openoffice.org http://www.linux.org -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version 3.1GIT d S: a C+++ UL++++ P+ L++ W++ N+ W--- O! V! PS+ Y! t+++ 5 X+++ R tv- b- DI! D++ G e H! r! z?
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK---- - The Mailing List for the Devon & Cornwall LUG Mail majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe list" in the message body to unsubscribe. FAQ: www.dcglug.org.uk/linux_adm/list-faq.html